California Court Overrules Dismissal of the Action Filed by Russian Bank

A Russian bank, represented by Marks & Sokolov, filed an action in the Superior Court of California to domesticate a Russian judgment for over...

Sergey Sokolov in Forbes. Debts of Subsidiaries and Parent Companies: How Sanctions Are Rewriting Corporate Law”

November 25, 2025. Forbes. Sergey Sokolov, the Managing Director of Moscow Office of Marks & Sokolov, LLC explained at the Forbes Forum that...

Marks & Sokolov Secures an OFAC License for Enforcement of a Foreign Judgment in the U.S.

Marks & Sokolov has achieved another success in its sanctions-related practice by obtaining an OFAC license authorizing its client to enforce a...

Marks & Sokolov, LLC secured dismissal with prejudice of claims by Google, LLC against Russian media companies

September 26, 2025. Marks & Sokolov, LLC secured dismissal with prejudice of claims by Google, LLC against Russian media companies ANO...

Bruce Marks speaks at RT’s Sanchez Effect in Moscow, Russia

American Perspectives on Global Affairs from Moscow In a recent episode of RT’s Sanchez Effect, host Rick Sanchez welcomed Bruce Marks, a former...

Bruce Marks speaks at ThoughtLeaders4’s Sovereign & States Litigation Summit USA

We’re pleased to announce that Bruce Marks, Founder and Managing Member of Marks & Sokolov, will be speaking at ThoughtLeaders4’s Sovereign...

Marks & Sokolov Secures Major Cross-Border Victory in Delaware Court of Chancery

by | Nov 21, 2025 | Blog, Results | 0 comments

November 14, 2025: After almost 11 years of litigation spanning courts in the BVI, UK, Alabama, Florida, New York, Delaware and Ohio, Marks & Sokolov obtained a decisive victory in the Delaware Court of Chancery with the dismissal of claims brought by Vadim M. Shulman, Bracha Foundation and Hornbeam Corporation against multiple defendants, including PrivatBank, which sought more than $80 million in damages based on allegations of misappropriation, fraud, self-dealing and civil RICO regarding a joint venture investment in an Ohio steel mill and other agreements.

The Chancery Court held that based upon the prior 2015 dismissal Marks & Sokolov had obtained in Ohio on plaintiffs’ same claims, their Delaware claims were barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, which precludes parties from re-litigating matters previously decided.  In Ohio, Marks & Sokolov established that Shulman lacked standing under British Virgin Islands (BVI) law to pursue claims concerning the subject companies’ internal affairs. The Chancery Court held the Ohio decision conclusively resolved the standing issue, preventing plaintiffs from proceeding in Delaware.

Marks & Sokolov represented Panikos Symeou, Halliwell Assets, Inc., and Querella Holdings, Ltd. This outcome underscores the firm’s strength and efficiency in defending complex, high-value cross-border disputes in multiple jurisdictions