Lessons that May be Learned from Failed Transactions and a Proposal for Owners of Aircraft and Yachts on the OFAC SDN List

While it is possible to buy a grounded Russian owned aircraft if the owner and the aircraft are not on the OFAC SDN List (the U.S. Office of Foreign...

Bruce Marks, Managing Member of Marks & Sokolov, LLC, speaks at the XII St. Petersburg International Legal Forum held on June 26-28, 2024

Bruce Marks, Managing Member of Marks & Sokolov, LLC, is invited to speak at the XII St. Petersburg International Legal Forum held on June...

$7,695,000 Claim Against Kanye 2020 Presidential Campaign Successfully Dismissed

Marks & Sokolov attorneys Bruce Marks and Tom Sullivan successfully obtained dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of a $7,695,000 claim against...

Bruce Marks gives interview to Russian NTV

Bruce Marks, former republican Pennsylvania State Senator, gives interview to Russian TV on Trump and Biden's Michigan visits  

Marks & Sokolov, LLC Obtains Recognition of Over $20 Million in Russian Judgments, Update

In November 2021, Marks & Sokolov obtained a significant victory in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on behalf of a leading Russian...

RBK – Russia gets new lawyers to represent its interest against Yukos

Россия нашла адвокатов для защиты от ЮКОСа, несмотря на санкции По меньшей мере три западных юрфирмы решили не представлять интересы России в...

M&S Lawyers Recover On Commercial Fraud

by | Dec 24, 2013 | Results

Deluxe International Group v. R&M Plastic Recycling, LLC
Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County Pennsylvania
 
What the Case Involved: Our client, a Canadian window manufacturer, ordered a quantity of PVC from an Ohio manufacturer, wiring the purchase price to a Pennsylvania attorney to hold the funds in escrow until the PVC was picked up by the Canadian window manufacturer’s trucking company.  When the trucks arrived at the Ohio PVC manufacture’s site, there was no product available.  The Canadian window manufacturer instructed the Pennsylvania escrow attorney to return its funds.  However, the Pennsylvania escrow attorney had already released the funds to the Ohio PVC manufacturer claiming his involvement was done.  Marks & Sokolov instituted suit based upon fraud against the Pennsylvania escrow attorney and the Ohio PVC manufacturer and its principals.
Result:  Marks & Sokolov obtained a full recovery of the $40,244 payment from the Canadian window manufacturer from the Pennsylvania escrow attorney and a judgment for $20,000 for additional damages caused by the failure to deliver the PVC against the Ohio PVC manufacturer.  Tom Sullivan served as lead counsel.Deluxe International Group v. R&M Plastic Recycling, LLC
Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County Pennsylvania
 
What the Case Involved: Our client, a Canadian window manufacturer, ordered a quantity of PVC from an Ohio manufacturer, wiring the purchase price to a Pennsylvania attorney to hold the funds in escrow until the PVC was picked up by the Canadian window manufacturer’s trucking company.  When the trucks arrived at the Ohio PVC manufacture’s site, there was no product available.  The Canadian window manufacturer instructed the Pennsylvania escrow attorney to return its funds.  However, the Pennsylvania escrow attorney had already released the funds to the Ohio PVC manufacturer claiming his involvement was done.  Marks & Sokolov instituted suit based upon fraud against the Pennsylvania escrow attorney and the Ohio PVC manufacturer and its principals.
Result:  Marks & Sokolov obtained a full recovery of the $40,244 payment from the Canadian window manufacturer from the Pennsylvania escrow attorney and a judgment for $20,000 for additional damages caused by the failure to deliver the PVC against the Ohio PVC manufacturer.  Tom Sullivan served as lead counsel.