Bruce Marks gives interview to Russian NTV

Bruce Marks, former republican Pennsylvania State Senator, gives interview to Russian TV on Trump and Biden's Michigan visits  

Marks & Sokolov, LLC Obtains Recognition of Over $20 Million in Russian Judgments, Update

In November 2021, Marks & Sokolov obtained a significant victory in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on behalf of a leading Russian...

RBK – Russia gets new lawyers to represent its interest against Yukos

Россия нашла адвокатов для защиты от ЮКОСа, несмотря на санкции По меньшей мере три западных юрфирмы решили не представлять интересы России в...

1782 Discovery Blog: International Wires Frozen Subject To U.S. Sanctions May Be Released Pursuant To OFAC License

The United States has imposed sanctions on certain Russian individuals, companies and banks which prohibit U.S. persons from conducting business...

U.S. SANCTIONS ON RUSSIA

The United States has imposed sanctions on certain Russian individuals, companies and banks which prohibit U.S. persons from conducting business...

The Question Of Whether 28 U.S.C. §1782 Allows Discovery For Use In Private International Arbitration Is Back Before The U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. allows parties to non-U.S. litigation proceedings to obtain documents and witness testimony from sources within the U.S., even if such...

M&S Lawyers Recover On Commercial Fraud

by | Dec 24, 2013 | Results

Deluxe International Group v. R&M Plastic Recycling, LLC
Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County Pennsylvania
 
What the Case Involved: Our client, a Canadian window manufacturer, ordered a quantity of PVC from an Ohio manufacturer, wiring the purchase price to a Pennsylvania attorney to hold the funds in escrow until the PVC was picked up by the Canadian window manufacturer’s trucking company.  When the trucks arrived at the Ohio PVC manufacture’s site, there was no product available.  The Canadian window manufacturer instructed the Pennsylvania escrow attorney to return its funds.  However, the Pennsylvania escrow attorney had already released the funds to the Ohio PVC manufacturer claiming his involvement was done.  Marks & Sokolov instituted suit based upon fraud against the Pennsylvania escrow attorney and the Ohio PVC manufacturer and its principals.
Result:  Marks & Sokolov obtained a full recovery of the $40,244 payment from the Canadian window manufacturer from the Pennsylvania escrow attorney and a judgment for $20,000 for additional damages caused by the failure to deliver the PVC against the Ohio PVC manufacturer.  Tom Sullivan served as lead counsel.Deluxe International Group v. R&M Plastic Recycling, LLC
Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County Pennsylvania
 
What the Case Involved: Our client, a Canadian window manufacturer, ordered a quantity of PVC from an Ohio manufacturer, wiring the purchase price to a Pennsylvania attorney to hold the funds in escrow until the PVC was picked up by the Canadian window manufacturer’s trucking company.  When the trucks arrived at the Ohio PVC manufacture’s site, there was no product available.  The Canadian window manufacturer instructed the Pennsylvania escrow attorney to return its funds.  However, the Pennsylvania escrow attorney had already released the funds to the Ohio PVC manufacturer claiming his involvement was done.  Marks & Sokolov instituted suit based upon fraud against the Pennsylvania escrow attorney and the Ohio PVC manufacturer and its principals.
Result:  Marks & Sokolov obtained a full recovery of the $40,244 payment from the Canadian window manufacturer from the Pennsylvania escrow attorney and a judgment for $20,000 for additional damages caused by the failure to deliver the PVC against the Ohio PVC manufacturer.  Tom Sullivan served as lead counsel.