Lessons that May be Learned from Failed Transactions and a Proposal for Owners of Aircraft and Yachts on the OFAC SDN List

While it is possible to buy a grounded Russian owned aircraft if the owner and the aircraft are not on the OFAC SDN List (the U.S. Office of Foreign...

Bruce Marks, Managing Member of Marks & Sokolov, LLC, speaks at the XII St. Petersburg International Legal Forum held on June 26-28, 2024

Bruce Marks, Managing Member of Marks & Sokolov, LLC, is invited to speak at the XII St. Petersburg International Legal Forum held on June...

$7,695,000 Claim Against Kanye 2020 Presidential Campaign Successfully Dismissed

Marks & Sokolov attorneys Bruce Marks and Tom Sullivan successfully obtained dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of a $7,695,000 claim against...

Bruce Marks gives interview to Russian NTV

Bruce Marks, former republican Pennsylvania State Senator, gives interview to Russian TV on Trump and Biden's Michigan visits  

Marks & Sokolov, LLC Obtains Recognition of Over $20 Million in Russian Judgments, Update

In November 2021, Marks & Sokolov obtained a significant victory in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on behalf of a leading Russian...

RBK – Russia gets new lawyers to represent its interest against Yukos

Россия нашла адвокатов для защиты от ЮКОСа, несмотря на санкции По меньшей мере три западных юрфирмы решили не представлять интересы России в...

M&S Lawyers Recover On U.C.C. Sales Contract

by | Dec 24, 2013 | Results

Hot Tub Hounds, Inc. v. Hot Water, Inc.
Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County Pennsylvania
 
What the Case Involved: Our client sold commercial spa equipment inventory to a retail distributor without a written sales agreement.  Our client invoiced the purchaser, which remitted partial payment.  When the seller demanded further payment, the buyer claimed the invoiced inventory was not fully delivered.  Marks & Sokolov instituted suit for the remaining balance due, plus interest.  As this was a sale of goods between commercial parties, Pennsylvania’s U.C.C. applied.
Result:  Through discovery, Marks & Sokolov established that the buyer’s defense of not receiving the invoiced inventory was precluded because under 13 Pa.C.S. §2201(b), the buyer had 10 days from the receipt of the invoice to challenge its contents and that the buyer’s accounting records indicated receipt and resale of the spa inventory.  A substantial recovery was made in favor of our client.   Tom Sullivan served as lead trial counsel.Hot Tub Hounds, Inc. v. Hot Water, Inc.
Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County Pennsylvania
 
What the Case Involved: Our client sold commercial spa equipment inventory to a retail distributor without a written sales agreement.  Our client invoiced the purchaser, which remitted partial payment.  When the seller demanded further payment, the buyer claimed the invoiced inventory was not fully delivered.  Marks & Sokolov instituted suit for the remaining balance due, plus interest.  As this was a sale of goods between commercial parties, Pennsylvania’s U.C.C. applied.
Result:  Through discovery, Marks & Sokolov established that the buyer’s defense of not receiving the invoiced inventory was precluded because under 13 Pa.C.S. §2201(b), the buyer had 10 days from the receipt of the invoice to challenge its contents and that the buyer’s accounting records indicated receipt and resale of the spa inventory.  A substantial recovery was made in favor of our client.   Tom Sullivan served as lead trial counsel.