Bruce Marks gives interview to RT News International

August 3, 2021 Bruce Marks, former republican PA State Senator, gives interview to RT News International on a decade-long investigation case in...

Legislative Report with Rep. Seth Grove and Bruce Marks

Marks & Sokolov welcomes new attorney Kirill Ratnikov

Marks & Sokolov, LLC is pleased to announce that Kirill Ratnikov has joined the firm as Of Counsel. Kirill currently provides general counsel...

Class actions in Russia: case law development following the reform

The Federal Law dated 18.07.2019 No 191-FZ “On Amending Some Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as Law No 191)[1]...

1782 Discovery Blog: The U.S. Supreme Court Will Consider Application Of §1782 Discovery To International Commercial Arbitration

In Servotronics, Inc. v. Boeing Co., 954 F.3d 209, 210 (4th Cir. 2020) the Fourth Circuit recently held a private arbitration panel convened in...

Developments in Judicial Interpretation of the Recent Law Expanding Russian Courts’ Exclusive Jurisdiction to Disputes Related to Sanctions Against Russians

Six years after the introduction of sanctions against Russia by the United States and the European Union, the new sanctions-related amendments to...

Proposed Principles for the Sale of Repossessed Business Aircraft

by | Sep 2, 2020 | Blog

September 1, 2020

It is in the best interests of banks engaged in aircraft finance, aircraft lessors, aircraft brokers, and aircraft owners to standardize and make transparent the process to resell repossessed business aircraft. Adherence to best practices in this process would remove risks and costs for banks and other creditors, generate business for reputable aircraft brokers and appraisers, and would be fair to aircraft owners.

The process to resell repossessed aircraft should be governed by a set of principles that should be incorporated in aircraft finance and security agreements (the “Principles”). The Principles set out below would satisfy the requirements for a commercially reasonable sale of a repossessed aircraft, within the meaning of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (the “UCC”). Each party to a transaction would be treated fairly, and the risks and costs for creditors highlighted by the cases discussed below may be avoided.

Presently, banks, aircraft finance companies, and aircraft lessors (collectively, “Banks”) generally each have their own standard terms and conditions for loan agreements, aircraft security agreements, and guaranty agreements. These terms and conditions vary from Bank to Bank and do not protect Banks from becoming engaged in disputes and litigation.

Existing standard terms and conditions typically provide that, following an event of default, a Bank has unlimited discretion in selling a repossessed aircraft. The Bank may sell the aircraft to any party it chooses and at any price it chooses. Not surprisingly, this discretion is sometimes abused, as illustrated in the cases discussed below, and in other cases known to the authors. Disputes typically involve the sale of an aircraft by a Bank at a price less than the aircraft’s then current fair market value.